Quantifacts - Wealth Management Software & Services
 
Q4 - Model and Apply New Fees

Home | Software Products & Services | Quantifacts Q4 | Profit Manager | Outsourced Services | Case Studies

 
 
 
Model and Apply New Fees
Typical Pricing Objectives you might set
Phases of a Fee Modeling Study
Benefits
Implementing New Fees
 

Now you can accurately evaluate proposed fee schedules. You can calculate any proposed schedule's impact on both overall and individual account trust fees.

You no longer need to estimate a new fee schedule's impact on trust revenues!

Use our Q4 Wealth Management System to determine if a proposed fee schedule meets any number of detailed pricing objectives you establish.

Typical Pricing Objectives you might set:

Desired total fees

Desired total fees when the market goes up or down

Acceptable risk of account loss defined as a desired range of price increase percentages by size and type of account

Market position – your fees versus competitors

Fee schedule appearance

Fee consolidation or simplification objectives

Change the mix of explicit fees and retained fund level fees

Other specific objectives, example, “Get rid of the base fee!”

Phases of a Fee Modeling Study:

We have over 25 years experience working with many of the nation's leading banks. Based on this experience, we suggest the following steps in a fee modeling study.

1. Define the universe of accounts to be priced.

2. Create and save fee schedules (current competitors' and prospective new fees).

3. Project Total Fees Under Different Market Conditions

If values decline 10%, our fees will be down $16 million! Do we need to plan for this?

4. Analyze the Competition

Develop Competitive Positions Profile, using your competitors:
A. Run competitors' fees against your accounts
B. Compare your fees to industry benchmarks – Use the Wealth Management Fee Survey.
C. Determine when you, and your competitors, last changed fees.
D. Set final competitive price guidelines

Show current revenue versus fees projected with the competitors’ fee schedules

 

Determine final schedules and projected new revenue:

5. Manage the risk of account loss:

A. Measure the range of price change and account loss which occurred for prior fee changes.
B. Project the range of price changes which will occur among your accounts for this fee change
C. Set guidelines for acceptable range of increase by specific size groups, example, if our guideline is to increase fees 20-25%, Fee Schedule NEW5, puts the most accounts in this target:

D. Run trial account lists showing old and new fee and the percent fee change.

ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ACCOUNT LONG NAME
VALUE
000'S
CURRENT
FEE
NEW
FEE
PERCENT
CHANGE
7211AQ02005 KENNETH STARR  
1,603
16,321
19,827
21
7211AQ61001 DENNIS HASTERT 
3,226
24,617
30,756
25
7211BE43005 JANET RENO     
1,659
16,713
20,331
22
7211BF34001 ANDREA MITCHELL
1,367
14,669
17,703
21
7211BF74007 GREG CRAIG     
1,992
19,044
23,328
22
7211BF99004 DAVID KENDALL, ESQ
2,591
21,760
26,946
24
7211BG78006 STROM THURMOND 
1,546
15,922
19,314
21
7211J295003 TOM BROKAW     
32,886
158,087
179,830
14
7211J296001 BRIAN WILLIAMS 
3,241
24,685
30,846
25
7211K308002 SAMUAL SOSA    
4,810
31,745
39,450
24
7211M094006 MONICA LEWINSKY
1,376
14,732
17,784
21
7211M316003 WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON III  
3,576
26,192
32,856
25
7211P020008 STEVE LARGENT
1,014
12,198
14,526
19
7211P426007 ELIZABETH DOLE, PRESIDENT     
3,190
24,455
30,540
25
7211S093002 THEODORE KENNEDY  
3,009
23,641
29,454
25
7211S526001 CHARLES RUFF, ESQ              
1,224
13,668
16,416
20
7211S537008 KATHERINE WILLEY  
1,122
12,954
15,498
20
72213459001 JANET RENO     
2,983
23,524
29,298
25
72215615006 DENNIS RODMAN  
1,530
15,810
19,170
21
72216555003 ALAN GREENSPAN 
1,215
13,605
16,335
20
72216782003 ANDREA MITCHELL
2,777
22,597
28,062
24
72217306000 GREG CRAIG     
1,521
15,747
19,089
21
72218615003 DAVID KENDALL, ESQ             
1,510
15,670
18,990
21
72218616001 STROM THURMOND 
1,485
15,495
18,765
21
72219168002 SAMUAL SOSA    
1,040
12,380
14,760
19
72219274008 ROSA PARKS     
1,425
15,075
18,225
21
7221C884000 DENNIS HASTERT 
2,360
20,720
25,560
23
7221E617002 STEVE LARGENT  
2,912
23,204
28,872
24
7221G384007 ELIZABETH DOLE, PRESIDENT      
3,626
26,417
33,156
26

Benefits:

Fee schedules optimized to meet your objectives

Fees may be $ millions more than from poorly designed schedules

Avoid pricing errors – fee decreases to some accounts, or, for other accounts, excessive increases resulting in account loss, discounting, or fee reversals

Peace of mind! You really know what is going to happen in advance.

Implementing New Fees:

Regardless of how well you designed your new fee schedules, you must pay special attention to how you will implement new fees. Suppose you raise your minimum fee to $5,000. You still have accounts which pay a $1,000 minimum. Will you increase their fee 5 times? Will they be phased up over time? Or maybe you acquired a bank last year whose trust fees are 40% lower. Are those accounts moving directly onto the new fee schedules?

So you will need rules as to how to apply new fees. And you would like to try out those rules and see how your bottom line will change and how specific accounts will be affected.

Editorial note: to the extent that you did a good job modeling your new fees, you will need fewer rules for applying new fees to real accounts. These rules create discounting and a greater substandard fee problem. For example, if all accounts over $5 million will have excessive increases, say over 25%, you should correct this in the fee schedule design and not with rules for applying new fees.

In the fee implementation phase, you need to create rules for implementing new fees. These can include the following:

  • Modify minimum fee based on prior minimums
  • Set discount to implement maximum fee increases
  • Set rules for specific account groups – acquired banks, related accounts, etc.

 

  Home | Top
 
Wealth Management Reporting