| |
Now you can
accurately evaluate proposed fee schedules. You can calculate
any proposed schedule's impact on both overall and individual
account trust fees.
You no longer need to estimate a new fee schedule's impact
on trust revenues!

Use our Q4 Wealth Management System to determine
if a proposed fee schedule meets any number of detailed pricing
objectives you establish.
Typical Pricing Objectives you might
set:
Desired total fees
Desired total fees when the market goes up or down
Acceptable risk of account loss defined as
a desired range of price increase percentages by size and
type of account
Market position – your fees versus competitors
Fee schedule appearance
Fee consolidation or simplification objectives
Change the mix of explicit fees and retained
fund level fees
Other specific objectives, example, “Get
rid of the base fee!”
Phases of a Fee Modeling Study:
We have over 25 years experience working with
many of the nation's leading banks. Based on this experience,
we suggest the following steps in a fee modeling study.
1. Define the universe of accounts to be
priced.
2. Create and save fee schedules (current
competitors' and prospective new fees).
3. Project Total Fees Under Different Market
Conditions
If values decline 10%, our fees will be down
$16 million! Do we need to plan for this?

4. Analyze the Competition
Develop Competitive Positions Profile, using
your competitors:
A. Run competitors' fees against your accounts
B. Compare your fees to industry benchmarks –
Use the Wealth Management Fee Survey.
C. Determine when you, and your competitors, last changed
fees.
D. Set final competitive price guidelines
Show current revenue versus fees projected
with the competitors’ fee schedules

Determine final schedules and projected new
revenue:

5. Manage the risk of account loss:
A. Measure the range of price change and account
loss which occurred for prior fee changes.
B. Project the range of price changes which will occur among
your accounts for this fee change
C. Set guidelines for acceptable range of increase by specific
size groups, example, if our guideline is to increase fees
20-25%, Fee Schedule NEW5, puts the most accounts in this
target:

D. Run trial account lists showing old and
new fee and the percent fee change.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER |
ACCOUNT LONG NAME
| VALUE
000'S |
CURRENT
FEE |
NEW
FEE |
PERCENT
CHANGE |
| 7211AQ02005 |
KENNETH STARR
| 1,603 |
16,321 |
19,827 |
21 |
| 7211AQ61001 |
DENNIS HASTERT
| 3,226 |
24,617 |
30,756 |
25 |
| 7211BE43005 |
JANET RENO
| 1,659 |
16,713 |
20,331 |
22 |
| 7211BF34001 |
ANDREA MITCHELL
| 1,367 |
14,669 |
17,703 |
21 |
| 7211BF74007 |
GREG CRAIG
| 1,992 |
19,044 |
23,328 |
22 |
| 7211BF99004 |
DAVID KENDALL, ESQ
| 2,591 |
21,760 |
26,946 |
24 |
| 7211BG78006 |
STROM THURMOND
| 1,546 |
15,922 |
19,314 |
21 |
| 7211J295003 |
TOM BROKAW
| 32,886 |
158,087 |
179,830 |
14 |
| 7211J296001 |
BRIAN WILLIAMS
| 3,241 |
24,685 |
30,846 |
25 |
| 7211K308002 |
SAMUAL SOSA
| 4,810 |
31,745 |
39,450 |
24 |
| 7211M094006 |
MONICA LEWINSKY
| 1,376 |
14,732 |
17,784 |
21 |
| 7211M316003 |
WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON III |
3,576 |
26,192 |
32,856 |
25 |
| 7211P020008 |
STEVE LARGENT
| 1,014 |
12,198 |
14,526 |
19 |
| 7211P426007 |
ELIZABETH DOLE, PRESIDENT
| 3,190 |
24,455 |
30,540 |
25 |
| 7211S093002 |
THEODORE KENNEDY
| 3,009 |
23,641 |
29,454 |
25 |
| 7211S526001 |
CHARLES RUFF, ESQ
| 1,224 |
13,668 |
16,416 |
20 |
| 7211S537008 |
KATHERINE WILLEY
| 1,122 |
12,954 |
15,498 |
20 |
| 72213459001 |
JANET RENO
| 2,983 |
23,524 |
29,298 |
25 |
| 72215615006 |
DENNIS RODMAN
| 1,530 |
15,810 |
19,170 |
21 |
| 72216555003 |
ALAN GREENSPAN
| 1,215 |
13,605 |
16,335 |
20 |
| 72216782003 |
ANDREA MITCHELL
| 2,777 |
22,597 |
28,062 |
24 |
| 72217306000 |
GREG CRAIG
| 1,521 |
15,747 |
19,089 |
21 |
| 72218615003 |
DAVID KENDALL, ESQ
| 1,510 |
15,670 |
18,990 |
21 |
| 72218616001 |
STROM THURMOND
| 1,485 |
15,495 |
18,765 |
21 |
| 72219168002 |
SAMUAL SOSA
| 1,040 |
12,380 |
14,760 |
19 |
| 72219274008 |
ROSA PARKS
| 1,425 |
15,075 |
18,225 |
21 |
| 7221C884000 |
DENNIS HASTERT
| 2,360 |
20,720 |
25,560 |
23 |
| 7221E617002 |
STEVE LARGENT
| 2,912 |
23,204 |
28,872 |
24 |
| 7221G384007 |
ELIZABETH DOLE, PRESIDENT
| 3,626 |
26,417 |
33,156 |
26 |
Benefits:
Fee schedules optimized to meet your objectives
Fees may be $ millions more than from poorly
designed schedules
Avoid pricing errors – fee decreases
to some accounts, or, for other accounts, excessive increases
resulting in account loss, discounting, or fee reversals
Peace of mind! You really know what is going
to happen in advance.
Implementing New Fees:

Regardless of how well you designed your new
fee schedules, you must pay special attention to how you
will implement new fees. Suppose you raise your minimum
fee to $5,000. You still have accounts which pay a $1,000
minimum. Will you increase their fee 5 times? Will they
be phased up over time? Or maybe you acquired a bank last
year whose trust fees are 40% lower. Are those accounts
moving directly onto the new fee schedules?
So you will need rules as to how to apply new
fees. And you would like to try out those rules and see
how your bottom line will change and how specific accounts
will be affected.
Editorial note: to the extent that you did
a good job modeling your new fees, you will need fewer rules
for applying new fees to real accounts. These rules create
discounting and a greater substandard fee problem. For example,
if all accounts over $5 million will have excessive increases,
say over 25%, you should correct this in the fee schedule
design and not with rules for applying new fees.
In the fee implementation phase, you need to create
rules for implementing new fees. These can include the following:
- Modify minimum fee based on prior minimums
- Set discount to implement maximum fee increases
- Set rules for specific account groups –
acquired banks, related accounts, etc.
|