| |
Expanding
Profitability Reporting
In most wealth management firms, one person
is responsible for profitability – you! There is one
hot seat. There is one report detailing revenues, expenses,
and hopefully a profit.
Some firms have created several hot seats,
for example one for personal accounts, one for employee
benefit accounts, and, say, one for estates. Now it is necessary
to prepare a profit/loss report for each of these. These
businesses have their own staffs, but they also share in
use of certain service units such as operations, data processing,
personnel, and senior management. It is necessary to apply/allocate
these costs to each business.
Drawbacks are the following:
- Revenues not properly allocated to accounts
in each business
- Costs not allocated to accounts
- Allocations not based on real service usage
- Officer cost not allocated to his/her accounts
- Cost methods are fixed and may not be challenged
Cost Modeling
Today, modern managers want to establish many
hot seats, essentially making every account manager profit
responsible for his/her accounts.
To support this reporting, you must use cost
accounting to calculate profit/loss for each account.
Most general ledger systems provide a rudimentary
tool to perform profit/loss calculations for departments.
Most managers are unhappy with the results because the costing
methods are oversimplified. Few systems have the ability
to prepare profit/loss by account and officer.
With Profit Manager, you can model cost methods
and make changes until you achieve “buy in”
from the management team. We can help in this process. Because
the process is online and interactive, you can quickly reapply
costs, run p/l’s, and examine profit margins using
different methods. This helps you complete the negotiation
with managers and establish methods which are agreed to
as fair.
Profit/Loss By Officer
In the following example, the bank has decided
to prepare profit/loss by officer using only direct costs
and a gross margin.
| |
Personal
Trust 9 Months YTD |
Amy
Wilson
100 |
James
Pearson
124 |
Dorothy
Williams
133 |
Mary
Smith
139 |
Marsha
Young
142 |
John
Sampson
155 |
| Number of Accounts |
143 |
94 |
77 |
21 |
218 |
186 |
| Value For Fees |
$56,960 |
$29,016 |
$19,496 |
$14,668 |
$6,006 |
$340,356 |
| Full Value |
$62,279 |
$30,980 |
$22,534 |
$15,340 |
$6,006 |
$344,104 |
| Revenues |
| Trust Account Fees |
$290,239 |
$137,463 |
$88,370 |
$45,427 |
$90,173 |
$508,426 |
| Advisory Fees |
$57,662 |
$54,421 |
$25,291 |
$8,247 |
$7,920 |
$54,890 |
| Sweep Fees |
$7,889 |
$4,721 |
$13,274 |
$1,053 |
$3,775 |
$8,939 |
| Third Party Fees |
$12,382 |
$10,422 |
$4,314 |
$2,194 |
$1,973 |
$20,145 |
| Fund Custody Fees |
$5,436 |
$5,044 |
$3,283 |
$944 |
$1,075 |
$5,445 |
| Total Revenue |
$373,609 |
$212,071 |
$134,533 |
$57,864 |
$104,915 |
$597,846 |
| Basis Points |
| Per Admin Officer |
60.0 |
68.5 |
59.7 |
37.7 |
174.7 |
17.4 |
| Annualized |
80.0 |
91.3 |
79.6 |
50.3 |
232.9 |
23.2 |
| Direct Costs |
| Adminstrator Cost |
$40,604 |
$41,938 |
$37,945 |
$23,084 |
$26,852 |
$102,169 |
| Investment Officer Cost |
$39,296 |
$23,491 |
$20,256 |
$1,569 |
$2,236 |
$66,895 |
| Operations Direct Cost |
$106,922 |
$55,968 |
$36,595 |
$14,305 |
$21,773 |
$145,299 |
| Non-Direct Officer Salary & Benefits |
$21,431 |
$14,319 |
$11,840 |
$3,192 |
$26,981 |
$26,862 |
| Other Direct Cost |
$66,248 |
$44,480 |
$36,573 |
$8,892 |
$83,377 |
$82,872 |
| Total Direct Cost |
$274,501 |
$180,195 |
$143,209 |
$51,041 |
$161,218 |
$424,096 |
| Margins |
| Gross Margin |
$99,108 |
$31,876 |
$(8,676) |
$6,823 |
$(56,303) |
$173,750 |
| % Gross Margin |
26.5% |
15.0% |
-6.4% |
11.8% |
-53.7% |
29.1% |
Profit/Loss by Account
Here is a profit/loss by account. Note that
we show the p/l on actual fees and on would be standard
fees:

Analyze Where You Make and Lose Money
Use Profit Manager to conduct special studies.
Here we show, for small accounts, the range of profit loss.
Our worst accounts are on the left, our best are on the
right. The red bar represents the variance from standard
fees. Even if we collected this variance (a full, standard
fee in each account), we still could not make money on the
first 70% of these accounts!

Here is a segment of profitable accounts, with
values from $.5-2 million. But we lose money in lowest 30%,
and much of this appears to be due to the variance from
standard fees.

Benefits of Using Profit Manager:
- Establish profit consciousness among your
people.
- Measure the profitability at any level in
the organization and zero in on areas that need attention.
- You separate profitable accounts from unprofitable
accounts
- You rank officers by profitability
- You measure the profitability of lines
of business
- Tailor fee and commission increases that ensure
each account’s costs are covered.
- Identify accounts that are costly to serve
and focus on ways to either reduce their costs, or increase
fees.
- Array accounts by profitability levels and
find out why you have big losers and big winners.
- Optimize revenue increase and cost reduction
programs. No longer will all customers be painted with the
same broad brush. You can see the account-level, -income
impact of your decisions.
- Confidently and aggressively compete on pricing
being able to determine account level break-even points.
Use Profit Manager, Add Cost, P/L to
All Your Business Reports
A number of clients are including cost and
profit/loss results in all their business reporting. This
is an exciting prospect. Are your people increasing fees
in unprofitable accounts? Are substandard fee accounts unprofitable?
Make every account manager a Profit Manager.
|